-
Roar: Tigers Of The Sundarbans
Critic reviews and ratings
-
B-grade thrills make this creature feature sinful fun.
-
...deserves your attention because it’s a smartly executed film.
-
...suffers from an over-written, excessively punctuated plot that groans and heaves forward wheezing with baggage fatigue.
-
Roar's strengths lie in the novelty of the concept and the judicious use of CGI. Sure, the special effects could have been better but compared to standards set by its contemporaries, Roar doesn't far badly.
-
Even for the weak plot, I would recommend watching this movie if you like that adrenalin rush.
-
...the excessively weak story acts as a major spoiler.
-
Well-produced B-movie where the visual effects team that makes tigers act is let down by the acting prowess of humans.
-
...ends up as an ill-conceived tribute to an animal that deserves a more majestic showcase.
-
How does a film with majestic tigers, beautiful wildlife and tons of VFX (mostly CGI) get it so wrong? How does a film with a title like Roar turn out to be such a bore?
-
The film falters mainly because of its poor screenplay and average dialogues.
-
While it is commendable and also daring on Sadanah and Rizvi's part to set and shoot a film in the Sundarbans, one wishes they'd invested as much time in developing an engaging story as they did on the visual effects.
-
...is too full of the unnecessary, and devoid of the essentials.
-
...the journey to get the message is too slippery and full of loopholes. However, if you’re looking for a series of inadvertent laughs, then you’ll do just fine.
Best and worst reviewed movies (Min. 5 reviews)
Best
-
Worst
-
Best
-
Worst
-
Best
-
Worst
-
Best
-
Worst
-
Best
-
Worst
-
Best